The activists alleged that the project involved removal of vegetation, encroachment into wetlands and disturbance of mangrove patches, and that construction activity had led to the dumping of debris along the shoreline. They argued that these actions had affected local drainage and increased the risk of erosion and flooding during high tides. Photographs and site notes provided by residents were cited as part of the claims. The group called for immediate mitigation steps to prevent further harm while investigations proceed.
The group said it had submitted formal representations to municipal and environmental regulators and had sought site inspections by independent experts. Officials from the civic body were reported to be reviewing the submissions and examining permits and clearances for the project. Campaigners urged transparent disclosure of all environmental clearances and monitoring reports. Environmental groups said clear timelines for inspections and public release of findings were essential to restore trust.
Activists have sought restoration measures, including reinstatement of native vegetation and proper disposal of construction waste, and have requested an independent audit to assess ecological damage. They warned that without remedial action the project could set a precedent for future coastal works. The dispute underscores tensions between infrastructure development and environmental protection in the city. Observers noted that balancing urgent urban connectivity with coastal conservation requires stricter enforcement of existing safeguards.